Methodology
How we work
These rules apply to every piece of information on the platform. The system prevents publication if a rule is not met.
1.Every fact has its source
We show the original link, who published it, the date and a short excerpt. We keep a private copy of the source and its fingerprint (SHA-256) so we can prove what it said even if it changes or disappears.
2.Evidence levels
The evidence level is computed automatically from the sources: official document, direct record, several independent outlets, or a single outlet. With a single outlet, we say "according to" the source.
- Primary official source
- Official document (for example: CEP, Le Moniteur, a court).
- Direct record
- Direct document or recording.
- Multiple independent sources
- Several credible outlets with their own reporting.
- Single secondary source
- A single credible outlet; we present it as that source's report.
3.The same name is not the same person
Two people can share a name. An editor must confirm identity with other elements (office, constituency, party, official document). A name alone is never enough.
4.At least two people
The author of a piece of information cannot review or publish it. A serious allegation needs two different reviewers, one of whom is a senior editor or legal reviewer.
5.Legal matters
We distinguish allegations, investigations, trials and court rulings. An investigation or accusation is not proof of guilt.
6.Right of reply
Before publishing a serious allegation, we ask the person concerned for their response. Responses are published next to the information.
7.Corrections
We do not erase what we published: we publish a new version with a correction note, or withdraw it with the reason.
8.Research work
On every profile we show which categories we searched (education, public office, legal matters, etc.) and when. It is not a score or a percentage: it says what work has been done and what remains.
9.When nothing is shown
If we have published nothing in a category, that does not mean nothing exists. It means we have not yet found or verified the information. We always say so clearly.
10.Neutrality
We do not rank candidates, recommend any of them, or give any score (corruption, trust, integrity or otherwise). The comparison page puts facts side by side, with no winner. Citizens decide.
11.Translations
Haitian Creole is the primary language. When a text does not exist in the language you chose, we show the original and say so. A machine translation of an allegation is never presented as reviewed.
12.Dossiers and PDFs
A dossier is research prepared by Les Grands Dossiers, not a government, CEP or court document. Each dossier has a number (AE26-…) and a QR code to verify it on the site.
13.Artificial intelligence
AI tools may help the team search, but they never publish anything. People verify and publish.
14.Privacy
We do not publish private information (address, phone, family members outside politics). We never bypass an access control to obtain information.
